From the employer’s perspective, this is one of the most crucial aspects of the resume! At a glance, it quickly shows an applicants job history and work "stability" and can be a major or even the sole deciding factor in moving the resume into the "to be interviewed" pile.
Ex:
1995-2000 Most recent position
1991-1995 Previous Position
This way is not recommended!
In this example, it is possible that the candidate was unemployed some time during 1991 (let's say from Feb -Nov), however, by looking at the dates it's not immediately apparent - it appears as if this person worked during all of 1991 and all of 2000.
Professional experience and research has shown that when a candidate uses this type of dating format, at least 50% of the time there was probably some sort of an employment gap - especially if the person has held several jobs over a relatively short period of time or number of years. When a resume is created in this way, the employer usually meets it with initial concern! Employers are aware of this tactic, and in many instances, they perceive it as deliberate deception, and unfortunately, the candidate is not considered further. Don't let this happen to you! Remember, the month and the year as a rule should always be included for the 2 most recent positions (if different companies) or 10 years (if with the same company). ( Click to go on top )
The candidate should always keep in mind - If an employer has a specific question about the dates of these positions they will ask, so it's still good idea to try and have the exact dates available if needed!
Ex:
Nov 1996 Dec 2000 Most recent
Jan 1990 - Feb 1996 Previous Position
This way is best and the recommended way!
Bottom Line - It says " that you want to be up-front and honest" (traits of a good future employee)...
